
Maybe that's my destiny in life. To live the richest, most passionate life possible, and yet against my better judgments.
this is my own personal filter, magnifying glass, and camera to help me make some sense of this world, capturing moments others may miss - new trend in fashion, intriguing environmentally sound 'green' architecture, a New York Times editorial, a computer game inspired by an extreme urban sport, ethnic cuisines home cooked or out, a quirky text message from my niece, a museum visit - most anything! I then inspect, reflect, introspect, blog...
My dad's funeral, 2006. I needed some air after the service, and my niece, studying photojournalism at the time, snapped this picture.
"We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."
- Anais Nin
Where do they come from and where do they go?
Why do people create knowing that it will eventually be destroyed? Why do people cling to life knowing that they must someday die? None of that will have meant anything once you do.
Kefka may have been completely batshit insane, but he raises a good point. Why do we do the things we do? What does it mean to live? Why do you insist on living and finding happiness knowing that it is temporary and death is probably eternal? What is your response when you are faced with these questions?
First of all, I wouldn't trust Kafka to be my guru even if I were considering razor blades on my wrist instead of on my unshaved face. The guy most likely didn't know shit about enjoying himself, he was emo before emo was emo. Amazing writer, though.
Secondly, I have no idea if there is an afterlife (I'm atheist) but damn shit if I try not to have as much fun as I possibly could in this life I have now and to be as good as I can to other people.
I don't "cling" to life. I make hot passionate love to it. I lust for it and in it. Not because I'm desperate, but because it's there to take advantage of. It's not death I'm scared of, it's the absence of living.
Years ago I nearly died myself, from a medical condition, so I have some idea how it would feel to be on that "event horizon" of existence. It taught me a lesson: be good, have fun, lust is your friend, and build and create and enjoy while you're around and not give a shit if it all ceases to exist when you do. Because you have nothing else better to do, and what good would it do to just mope in a dark corner?
The idea of the worthlessness of this life hints at a lack of imagination and self-esteem, and certainly to a kind of laziness in imbuing value and a sense of time well spent, no matter how brief that time may be and no matter how mysterious dying may be perceived in terms of what may or may not come afterward.
Oh, I've done my share of navel gazing. The difference is that I got the fuck over it. My navel only looks interesting for so long, you know.
"AWWWWW! This is so excruciatingly corny and trite and whoever put it together with those cheap sofa painting backgrounds and deafeningly loud elevator/shopping mall music should be flogged senseless.
But the message is well taken and I agree. Thanks to all my parachute packers, I love you! May you never have to deal with unbearably corny 1970s style Hallmark greeting card type emails again."
xoxoxooxoxoxoxo
“I shall stay the way I am because I do not give a damn.”
San Francisco Identifies Buildings Most at Risk | New York Times
SAN FRANCISCO — The picturesque Victorians and brightly painted apartment buildings where thousands of city residents live and work are especially vulnerable during earthquakes, according to a report issued Friday by the San Francisco Department of Building Inspection.
The report said that an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.2 or higher could render unlivable as many as 85 percent of the city’s “soft-story” apartment buildings — those that are less structurally sound because their ground floors are open space, often used as retail stores or garages. At least 65,000 people live and work in the 2,800 most vulnerable buildings studied in the report.
As I read “Obama’s From Main St., Ain’t He?,” by Roger Cohen (column, The New York Times on the Web, Aug. 28), I started feeling a combination of rage and sorrow about the fact that being smart, articulate and well educated continues to be read as a deficit.Let’s bring back the idea that being well read, cleverly witty, sometimes serious and sometimes silly, and maybe knowing a bit of art, music and history are all worthy goals.
Barack Obama is Main Street? Let’s hope so.
- Jane Nordli Jessep
Westport, Conn., Aug. 28, 2008
Your life is too short and you have important things to do. Be discriminating about what images and ideas you permit into your mind. If you yourself don't chooose what thoughts and images you expose yourself to, someone else will, and their motives may not be the highest. It is the easiest thing in the world to slide imperceptibly into vulgarity. But there's no need for that to happen if you determine not to waste your time and attention on mindless pap.** As intepreted by Sharon Lebell in The Art Of Living: The Classical Manual On Virtue, Happiness, And Effectiveness (Harper-Collins 1994).
"Writer and scholar Susan Jacoby is sure to raise some hackles with The Age of American Unreason - an unsparing jeremiad that attacks the dumbing-down of the American public. Jacoby's area of study is US intellectual history, though she worries that the field is becoming a moot point in the face of our country's pervasive "infotainment" complex.
As politics get folded into entertainment, she argues, so too does morality become indistinguishable from consumerism. Though hardly the first to bemoan the pitfalls of mass culture, Jacoby's portrait of American anti-intellectualism is especially germane in the middle of an election year." - Booksmith, San Francisco